<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Fix IT Planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/how-to-fix-it-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/how-to-fix-it-planning/</link>
	<description>IT Strategies for CIOs and IT leaders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:10:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for Dec 20 2009 &#124; Eric D. Brown, Consultant &#124; Technology, Strategy, People and Projects - Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/how-to-fix-it-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-6775</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for Dec 20 2009 &#124; Eric D. Brown, Consultant &#124; Technology, Strategy, People and Projects - Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1622#comment-6775</guid>
		<description>[...] How to Fix IT Planning by Chris Curran on CIO Dashboard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to Fix IT Planning by Chris Curran on CIO Dashboard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john sviokal</title>
		<link>http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/how-to-fix-it-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-6713</link>
		<dc:creator>john sviokal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1622#comment-6713</guid>
		<description>hey chris,

i think this planning difficulty comes from the issue that IT is both a line &amp; staff function.  the line issues sit in the biz units -- and should be cranked up or down with what value they can create. the administrative IT is something that should be spread about the firm.

best,
j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey chris,</p>
<p>i think this planning difficulty comes from the issue that IT is both a line &amp; staff function.  the line issues sit in the biz units &#8212; and should be cranked up or down with what value they can create. the administrative IT is something that should be spread about the firm.</p>
<p>best,<br />
j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john sviokal</title>
		<link>http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/how-to-fix-it-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-30630</link>
		<dc:creator>john sviokal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1622#comment-30630</guid>
		<description>hey chris,

i think this planning difficulty comes from the issue that IT is both a line &amp; staff function.  the line issues sit in the biz units -- and should be cranked up or down with what value they can create. the administrative IT is something that should be spread about the firm.

best,
j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey chris,</p>
<p>i think this planning difficulty comes from the issue that IT is both a line &amp; staff function.  the line issues sit in the biz units &#8212; and should be cranked up or down with what value they can create. the administrative IT is something that should be spread about the firm.</p>
<p>best,<br />
j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/how-to-fix-it-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-6667</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1622#comment-6667</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by gsrturbos: How to Fix IT Planning: In response to the last post on the broken state of IT planning, one commenter noted:
This ... http://bit.ly/7DuiXc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by gsrturbos: How to Fix IT Planning: In response to the last post on the broken state of IT planning, one commenter noted:<br />
This &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/7DuiXc.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/7DuiXc..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fibol</title>
		<link>http://www.ciodashboard.com/it-strategy/how-to-fix-it-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-6661</link>
		<dc:creator>Fibol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ciodashboard.com/?p=1622#comment-6661</guid>
		<description>You made some Great point Chris, and our friend Mr Potts should see some interresting statements.
I reckon that one of the key changing force (when relate to strategic planning) is the way corporation has grown in the past years (essentially by M&amp;A) sometimes to the disadvantage of organic growth. It has tremendously impacted the strategic planning process and the frequent misalignement between enterprise vs business unit is a conscequence of it.
Fibol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made some Great point Chris, and our friend Mr Potts should see some interresting statements.<br />
I reckon that one of the key changing force (when relate to strategic planning) is the way corporation has grown in the past years (essentially by M&amp;A) sometimes to the disadvantage of organic growth. It has tremendously impacted the strategic planning process and the frequent misalignement between enterprise vs business unit is a conscequence of it.<br />
Fibol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

